Sunday, December 31, 2006

Sign of Peace

(via Mysterium Fidei)

Did you know that the Sign of Peace is not mandatory. In fact the rubric reads, "The deacon (or priest) may add" Let us offer each other the Sign of Christ's peace. The "may" implies it not to be mandatory but optional. Possibly suitable for more solemn celebrations if done properly. This is why Pope Benedict XVI refrains from doing this in Papal Masses, because it is not essential!

So where should the Sign of Peace be? Do you think that the Sign of Peace should be moved to the Penitential Rite? I think the concept is great, "make peace with your brother, then offer a Sacrifice to God." But, maybe while we are confessing our sins would be a better time. The interruption during the Liturgy of the Eucharist and Communion Rite would no longer exist. I have heard rumors from Australia's Cardinal Pell that this is being considered. "Pax Tecum. Et cum spiritu tuo."

Comments: In fact, the General Instructions of the Roman Missal state that is should be done in a somber manner. Pope Benedict once said, "The Sign of Peace should be done only with those closest to you, and in a solemn mannner. This idea of the sign of peace being a party is one of the biggest problems in the Liturgy. It is a sign of reconciliation with eachother, and I suggest it only be done with the person on each side of one." (Aug 15, 1987, Vatican City.)

Labels: ,


Comments: Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]





<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]